Iran Has the Right to Strike Israel. Again.

After an overnight Israeli attack on Iranian military installations that petered out like a wet firecracker, it is imperative to state the obvious that Iran has the right to strike Israel again to defend itself from Israeli terror. One that started when Israel bombed the Iranian consulate in Damascus on April 1, 2024, in order to kill one Iranian general. That act violated the sovereignty of Iran, which was followed by another Israeli attack in Tehran that took the life of Ismael Haniyeh, a Hamas spokesman. Also, violating Iranian sovereignty.

Israel is the aggressor in this equation, and Iran is not the first country this Jewish supremacist country is violating their sovereignties. Israel is also bombing Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, in addition to Gaza and the West Bank. All because these countries play a role in resisting Israel’s apartheid against the Palestinian people.

Did South Africa, at the height of its system of apartheid, ever bomb Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, and Zimbabwe? No, the Afrikaners did not, but the Zionist Jews of Israel do, and then they play the victim.

We all remember how little money the US government allocated to the victims of hurricane Helene in North Carolina. Israel comes first.

THE PROS OF AN IRANIAN RETALIATION

This question poses a dilemma because of its pros and cons. Let us examine them closely:

The Pros:

• Iran asserts itself with its own military now challenging Israel on a permanent basis. Israel will forever fear Iran striking again because of its lethal missiles and what looks like a high degree of efficiency of its missile defense system.
• If Iran strikes Israel, and it leads to a regional war, both Gaza and Lebanon would breathe a sigh of relief as Israel turns its full attention to defending against the Iranian onslaught.
• The axis of resistance regains its confidence, and will begin imposing its will on the region in spite of U.S. ironclad support for Israel. Domestically speaking, that support is weakening as strong opposition to billions flying out the door to protect a foreign country is becoming an election issue. We all remember how little money the US government allocated to the victims of hurricane Helene in North Carolina. In addition to other social ills that the US government has tossed aside to protect Israel. Israel always comes first.

The problem with a small Iranian retaliatory strike is that the ethnic cleansing, the starvation, and the deliberate killing of women and children in Gaza would continue.

THE CONS OF AN IRANIAN RETALIATION

The Cons:

• A regional war between Iran and Israel might metastasize quickly into WWIII. The US defends Israel, and Russia has signed a strategic partnership with Iran, the details of which we don’t know. This could very well become a nuclear standoff between two superpowers that would wreak havoc on the U.S. economy.
• The United States might attack Iran with all its might no matter the outcome in order to re-calibrate Israel’s escalation deterrence supremacy. Such scenario would also wreak havoc on all the economies of the world should Iran decide to bomb all oil installations and oil traffic through the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf to retaliate against America’s war. This will definitely lead to a nuclear war, and the United States would not hesitate to turn Tehran into ashes.

A third option might be a small and calculated Iranian retaliation to settle the score for everyone not to lose face. In addition to Israel bombing Lebanon as it wishes with no end in sight unless Israel starts paying tool heavy a price for its terror.

We wonder why Israel always comes first.

Iran Has the Right to Strike Israel. Again.