No Difference Between Santos and Sinema

If anyone wanted to write a political book about lack of integrity and dishonesty in politics to include George Santos and Kyrsten Sinema, they will notice no difference between Santos and Sinema when it comes to lying. One lied about his resume, and the other lied to her voters. Which is worse? We believe lying to your constituents stand above the rest because it perpetuates corruption and lack of integrity in our political system.

Sinema is the Senator from Arizona who turned her back on all the promises she made to her voters and her political party, in her first year after getting elected, in a meretricious fashion in favor of selfishly accumulating wealth and power; something the mainstream media and the Democrats won’t make it so easy for her as they turn the heat on her legislative voting record.

One such record assisted in the fall of SVB bank after the bank contributed $50,000 to her campaign for her run in 2024 to pass pro-banking laws, which ultimately may have led to the bank’s fall from grace.

Here is a summary of who Kyrsten Sinema truly is: Make empty promises to your voters and then pass legislation to damage our economy for her to remain in power.

So, who is worse? George Santos or Kyrsten Sinema? In our opinion, there is no difference between Santos and Sinema. Both advertise the same fraudulent fabric.

WASHINGTON CORRUPTION

We have written often about the corrupt practices in Washington that fuels a race for contributory donations to elect and re-elect unfit politicians. In return, these politicians provide their votes for legislations big companies sponsor that favors their bottom lines; often at the expense of the middle class.

Once in a while, honest brokers actually pass legislation to help the American people, but almost never at the expense of the rich and powerful who doll out millions to stay ahead of the game. And who keeps that graft going but the likes of Kyrsten Sinema.

In a short few years, Kyrsten Sinema has come to epitomize everything that is wrong in Washington because of her voting record in a split Senate. Instead of choosing her constituents over special interests groups, as she promised them so often on her campaign trails, she swiveled 180 degrees to grovel to the highest bidder.

Genuflecting to money so easily has earned her our nickname “Vampire Kyrsten Sinema”. How else to describe someone who sucked the blood out of her own constituents in favor of highly-motivated corrupt practices?

So, who is worse? George Santos or Kyrsten Sinema? In our opinion, there is no difference between Santos and Sinema. Both advertise the same fraudulent fabric.

No Difference Between Santos and Sinema